Elevate SEND — People. Practice. Possibility.
Stage 7 of 9

Stage 7 · Evidence

Demo data

Observed change

Baseline against reassessment across the cohort, with the confidence–application gap narrowing.

“We delivered training” is not the endpoint. “We measured what changed” is the endpoint.

Application at baseline

59

Application at reassessment

76

Observed average Elevate change

+17 pts

Following intervention. Not a claim of causation.

Confidence / application gap

17 → 0 pts

The old endpoint

“We delivered training.”

  • · Staff attended the session
  • · Attendance was recorded
  • · The CPD log was updated
  • · Nothing was measured afterwards

The Elevate endpoint

“We measured what changed.”

  • · Baseline established before development
  • · Development targeted at the measured gap
  • · The same instrument applied again
  • · Change evidenced, with a next action

Change over the cycle

Elevate Score and application across the loop.

Elevate Score and application score across measurement cycles

Application before and after, by development area

Cohort-level change following targeted development.

Application scores before and after development intervention, by area

Observed improvement following intervention. The prototype does not establish causation.

Baseline gaps by area

The measured starting point the cycle was targeted against.

Heat indicates the measured confidence–application gap. Larger gaps are shown warmer.

One member of staff, same loop

Elevate Score

5874+16

Confidence

6479+15

Application

5170+19

What should we focus on next?

Priority recommendation

Application rose from 59 to 76 across the assessed cohort, and the confidence–application gap narrowed from 17 to 0 points.

Suggested action

Extend the same cycle to the remaining unassessed staff and reassess the priority area within 6–8 weeks.