Stage 7 · Evidence
Demo dataObserved change
Baseline against reassessment across the cohort, with the confidence–application gap narrowing.
“We delivered training” is not the endpoint. “We measured what changed” is the endpoint.
Application at baseline
59
Application at reassessment
76
Observed average Elevate change
+17 pts
Following intervention. Not a claim of causation.
Confidence / application gap
17 → 0 pts
The old endpoint
“We delivered training.”
- · Staff attended the session
- · Attendance was recorded
- · The CPD log was updated
- · Nothing was measured afterwards
The Elevate endpoint
“We measured what changed.”
- · Baseline established before development
- · Development targeted at the measured gap
- · The same instrument applied again
- · Change evidenced, with a next action
Change over the cycle
Elevate Score and application across the loop.
Application before and after, by development area
Cohort-level change following targeted development.
Observed improvement following intervention. The prototype does not establish causation.
Baseline gaps by area
The measured starting point the cycle was targeted against.
Heat indicates the measured confidence–application gap. Larger gaps are shown warmer.
One member of staff, same loop
Elevate Score
Confidence
Application
What should we focus on next?
Priority recommendation
Application rose from 59 to 76 across the assessed cohort, and the confidence–application gap narrowed from 17 to 0 points.
Suggested action
Extend the same cycle to the remaining unassessed staff and reassess the priority area within 6–8 weeks.
