Generate the impact report

Executive summary

Across the assessed cohort, confidence exceeded demonstrated application in every development area. Following a targeted intervention in the priority area, an average Elevate Score improvement was observed at reassessment.

Organisation profile

Single school, 100 staff, one measurement cycle. Development delivered through a combination of Elevate micro-learning and internal CPD time.

Baseline findings

Baseline measurement established confidence, capability and application scores for each assessed member of staff, aggregated to organisation level.

Confidence / capability gaps

The measured distance between self-reported confidence and demonstrated judgement or reported practice, by development area.

Priority development areas

Areas ranked by measured gap, with the largest gap recommended as the focus for the cycle.

• • Adaptive teaching — confidence 71, application 53 (18 pt gap)
• • Differentiation — confidence 84, application 68 (16 pt gap)
• • Behaviour support — confidence 70, application 56 (14 pt gap)
• • Inclusive practice — confidence 74, application 63 (11 pt gap)
• • Learner engagement — confidence 72, application 62 (10 pt gap)
• • Inclusive communication — confidence 81, application 75 (6 pt gap)

Intervention participation

Assignment and completion rates for the interventions connected to the priority area.

Post-intervention results

Reassessment scores for the cohort who completed the intervention.

Observed change

Change is reported as observed improvement following intervention. This prototype does not establish causation.

Recommendations

Increase practical application support in the priority area and reassess within 6–8 weeks. Extend measurement to the remaining unassessed staff.

Next measurement cycle

Proposed baseline for the next cycle in the following half term, with the same instrument to preserve comparability.